Just as Balak brings Bil’am to consider his enemy from
various vantage point, likewise does Parashat Balak allow us to view ourselves
from the vantage point of others. The main story in Balak is of a single piece,
and Am Yisrael appear only as foils for the central story – the interaction of
Bil’am with Hashem. What is curious is that not only does Am Yisrael not appear
as a real character in the story, we don’t even get a mention. Every time Balak
or Bil’am refer to Am Yisrael in the non-visionary passages, they employ
indirection: “this people”, “my enemies”, but never Yisrael. It almost feels
that they are avoiding speaking the name, one which Bil’am, at least, employs
so beautifully in his prophetic speeches.
Now, recalling that this story of the interaction of other
nations with Am Yisrael is being told in the Torah, I think the message is
this: Yisrael is our name in the context of our covenantal interactions with
Hashem, just as Hashem’s real name is used only in the context of His
covenantal interaction with Am Yiisrael. It’s not that it wasn’t known to the
outside – archeology has shown otherwise. It’s just that OUR sense of the function of the
name given us by Hashem when we struggled with the angel is that it is one
which bespeaks intimacy with Hashem. Others may employ the name in a technical
sense, but it falls flat. When Hashem uses it, we come alive. Reward or
punishment, it makes no difference, for the inner essence of the name Yisrael
is that intimacy which can only come from a struggle born of closeness. After
all, as Hashem says (Amos 3:2): “Only you do I know thoroughly and intimately,
from all the families of the earth”.
Comments