Parashat Behar-Bechukotai (Revised May 8, 2026) This week's double parashah, Behar and Bechuotai, bring to a close the book of Vayikra, a book the all-consuming focus of which is, undoubtably, KEDUSHAH, holiness. The last chapter is concerned largely with the kind of vows people make in dedicating something to the service of Hashem in the Mikdash. There are many laws regulating this seemingly noble motivation and its accompanying action, but my attention was taken this time around by the following law: "If (the devoted thing) is an animal of the kind from which an offering is brought to Hashem, any one which is given to Hashem shall be kodesh . One shall not exchange it ( lo yachalifenu ) nor shall one substitute for it ( yamir oto ), good for bad or bad for good; now if one DOES substitute for it, it will be that it and its substitute will be kodesh ." Vayikra 27:10-11 This mitzvah turns out to be very curious, because one is lashed for its intentional violation...
The prominence of the Shma passages in Jewish life is so great that, when we come to Parashat Va’etchanan, home of the famous first paragraph of the Shma, it is tempting to focus on those few verses to the exclusion of the rest of the Parashah. Which is exactly what I am planning to do! You see, as I was review the parashah earlier this week, I was struck by the repeated usages of the verb root Shin-Mem-Ayin. First, I noted that even the combination Shma and Yisrael is used two other times leading up to the epiphanic verse. But beyond that, the root appear no fewer than 23 (!) times in the course of three short chapters, almost 1/10 of all the appearance in the entire Torah – a six-fold increase in concentration. The mantra goes: a sudden increase in frequency of appearance of a given word or verb-root means – this is the key to the whole passage. So, it would seem that understanding what is implied by the word Shma holds the key to the entire parashah. But what does the word Shm...