Skip to main content

Accept No Substitutes

Parashat Behar-Bechukotai (Revised May 8, 2026) This week's double parashah, Behar and Bechuotai, bring to a close the book of Vayikra, a book the all-consuming focus of which is, undoubtably, KEDUSHAH, holiness. The last chapter is concerned largely with the kind of vows people make in dedicating something to the service of Hashem in the Mikdash. There are many laws regulating this seemingly noble motivation and its accompanying action, but my attention was taken this time around by the following law: "If (the devoted thing) is an animal of the kind from which an offering is brought to Hashem, any one which is given to Hashem shall be kodesh . One shall not exchange it ( lo yachalifenu ) nor shall one substitute for it ( yamir oto ), good for bad or bad for good; now if one DOES substitute for it, it will be that it and its substitute will be kodesh ." Vayikra 27:10-11  This mitzvah turns out to be very curious, because one is lashed for its intentional violation...

Brain-Link Fence


Is Mt. Sinai under construction in this week’s parashah? One could be forgiven for thinking so, since Hashem’s intructions to Moshe regarding preparation for His revelation to Am Yisrael include the erection of a fence around the mountain!


You say you don’t remember any fence? Take a look at the verses leading up to the the Ten Commandments: “Hashem said to Moshe, ‘Go down, (give testimony and thereby) warn the people, lest they destructively break through to Hashem to see, and many fall (i.e., die) from amongst them. Even the priests, who draw close to Hashem, must sanctify themselves, lest Hashem break out amongst them.” Moshe said to Hashem, the people are not ABLE to ascend the mountain, for You warned us saying, ‘Set up a boundary around the mountain and sanctify it.”


The people aren’t able to ascend, there’s a boundary there, set up precisely to avoid rash, impulsive spiritual overload. Clearly, this boundary can’t be made merely of stern warnings taken to heart, since Hashem knows that whatever they see at the moment of revelation is likely to overwhelm their caution and good sense. Nevertheless, He insists on an extra level of protection, while Moshe claims that the extra level is unnecessary, since the boundary constructed stands firm.


Of what was this boundary constructed? Let’s go back to the initial passage a few verses earlier, where Hashem gives instruction as to the preparations to be made in advance of Matan Torah:

Hashem said to Moshe: Go to the people and sanctify them today and tomorrow, and let them wash their clothing. Be ready for the third day, for on the third day, Hashem will descend upon Mt. Sinai before the people’s eyes. Bound the people around, telling them, ‘Guard yourselves from ascending the mountain, or even touching its edge. Whoever touches the mountain will surely die”.


At first glance, it would seem we’re not closer to finding the raw material from which the fence was constructed. In fact, it looks like the initial supposition, that the best de-fence is a good of-fence, is born out – the boundary is nothing more than the fear of divine punishment for those who, literally, trans-gress.


R. Meir Simcha HaKohen of Dvinsk, in his MeSHeKh Hochmah, interprets the words, Bound the people around differently. The Hebrew reads Hagbel et ha’am saviv, with the word for people serving as a direct object to the causative verb, make a boundary. Thus, Hashem is telling Moshe, “Use the people as raw material for the fence”. Here are his words:


The Divine Presence and the attendant phenomenon of prophecy extended up to the place where Yisrael stood facing the mountain, as it is stated (Devarim): Face to face did Hashem speak with you at the mountain. Just like with the Beit Hamikdash, it was permitted to touch the walls of the courtyards but forbidden to come into their space, since the walls served as partitions between the Sanctuary of Hashem and outside of it, likewise here, Yisrael served as the partitions between the revelation of the Glory of Hashem and that which is otherwise. Thus, the mountain was forbidden to be touched, since the holiness did not end at the mountain. Therefore, it states that the Glory had a boundary, and what was that boundary? The people!


Nothing can exist in our realm w/o being manifest via a vessel; everything of the world is a vessel, and the Kodesh, ultimately not of this world, becomes manifest in a place/time/soul vessel called Am Yisrael at Mt. Sinai. The containment vessel which is Am Yisrael doesn’t merely enable the manifestation of the holy, but it also defines the secular (means literally: temporal) realm – a realm cleansed of the overwhelming, radioactively-dangerous wholly holy, a realm which IS space for that which is other than holy. Ultimately, the secular is created to be MADE holy, but the tension between, on one hand, keeping the sacred at bay, to allow for the human, and, on the other hand, transforming our OWN material to become more G-dlike, more holy, less “vessalic” and more penetratingly liquid with holiness – this tension is the exasperating blessing of Am Yisrael from Hashem, for the world. No surprise people might wish to run away from the mountain, as the midrash on Parashat Beha’alotecha teaches us. No surprise people might be carried away by the smidgen of eventual ecstasy they were allow to taste at Sinai and want to run up the mountain to attain the intimacy they felt they couldn’t bear to be without.

Ulysses was lashed to the mast by his crew to heart the Siren’s song. Hashem has lashed us to the mast of His world with the rope of our own will bending to do His in this as-yet-unredeemed realm, with the inseverable cord of his Torah – a Mobius strip that, followed to the end, will turn out to have been, all along, that holiness which we sought to hold back, now embracing us for eternity.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Frontlet Lobotomy

The tefillin worn on the head (henceforth, “ shel rosh ”) differ in a number of respects from the tefillin worn on the arm (henceforth, “ shel yad ”). One of the differences is this: Though both must contain the four passages in the Torah which make mention of the mitzvah of tefillin, the shel yad has all four passages written on a single parchment, in the order they appear in the Torah, rolled up and placed in the single compartment of the shel yad . The shel rosh , however, is constructed such that it has four small compartments side by side. Though these compartments appear to be tightly bound to one another, in fact, they are almost actually completely separate from one another. They only join at a common base, like the fingers of one’s hand. Into each compartment is placed one of the four passages, written on four separate parchments. Here is a list of the passages, in the order they appear in the Torah: 1.        Kadesh Li – Shemot 13:1-10 ...

Shmini 5767

I try to read a piece of the parasha each night to Ayelet and Hillel, my two kids who are still young enough to be put to bed by parents. The other night, we were reading about the deaths of Nadav and Avihu as they offered "strange fire before the Eternal which He did not command". When we got to the part where (according to some interpretations) tries to console Aharon by indicating that the Mishkan had to be sanctified by the death of holy tzaddikim (thus, "your sons deaths indicates their tremendously high spiritual level"), and, the Torah continues, "Aharon was silent", Ayelet was not! "I can't understand that, Abba, how could he not cry upon the death of his two precious children?", she demanded? I tried to explain, but she wasn't buying, and it was late, so we said we'd return to the subject later... And as I rolled it around in my head, I realized that I wasn't buying either, because the storyline doesn't make sense: ...

Fixing the Flat with No Words to Spare

Emor  (revised and updated April 2026) Parashat Emor concludes with one of the only narrative passages in all of Chumash Vayikra - the story of the man who blasphemes. Although the account is brief, it must be of critical importance, for otherwise, why interrupt the halachic flow of Vayikra, a Chumash suspended in time with almost no dateable events, to tell us about a single foul-mouthed boor?