Skip to main content

An Ark Key


This week's parashah is about, pardon the expression, the anti-Moshe. Korach and his gang of fellow travelers and sycophants is set against Moshe as embodying precisely the opposite qualities as those which made Moshe fit for leadership. Both were wise, strong and wealthy, we are told, but while Moshe was the humblest of all men, Korach was full of himself. But before we jump to a satisfying dismissal of Korach, let's first allow him to speak and examine his claims – perhaps we'll be able to understand more deeply whence his self-immolating, doomed-from-the-start uprising.

"All the assembly, all of them, are holy, and the Eternal is in their midst!", Korach intones. Truer words were never spoken. After all, didn't Hashem say, "They shall make Me a sanctuary that I might dwell amongst them" (Shemot 25:8)? And didn't Hashem exclaim, "You shall be holy, for holy am I, Hashem, Who sanctifies you"? So what was so wrong with what Korach and his gang said?

Some want to locate Korach's mistake in the static, frozen image of holiness which Korach presents. Our promise of holiness is first enunciated by Hashem in Shemot 19, where He says: "And now, if you hearken to My voice and keep My covenant, then you shall be a treasure from amongst all the peoples, for all the earth is mine, and you shall become for me a kingdom of priests and a holy people". Notice that our holiness is conditional, following upon our godly actions. A presumption of holiness in place of the dynamic feedback-loop of actions-beget-holiness can lead to horrific conclusions.

But we haven't yet finished Korach's charges: "So why do you lift yourselves up over the congregation of Hashem"? Korach concludes. Ah, there it is – Moshe is charged with usurping power which has been invested in the entire people. Never mind that Hashem has repeatedly sought to invest Moshe with precisely this stature: at the sea: "And they believed in Hashem and Moshe His servant" and at the giving of the Torah: "And also in you shall they believe forever". In fact, the people themselves asked Moshe to serve as their go-between "Speak you with us, and we will heed, and let not Hashem speak with us, lest we die".

But Korach does NOT address the issue of prophecy – though he speaks in the plural, he seems to reserve his ire for Aharon. This is indicated by Moshe's responses, which defend Aharon and turn the questions back to Korach – the elevated status of levitical service s isn't enough for you that you seek also the high priesthood?

But how did Moshe know that Korach was really seeking the priesthood? He laid no such claim, and his words merely accused Moshe of arrogating to his small clan a prerogative which should have belonged to (the first born of) all the people: coming before Hashem in sacrificial proximity.

How ironic it is to discover, as the Midrash Tanchuma tells us, that Korach himself was one of those entrusted to carry the Holy Ark. The same man who assembles everyone who conceivably might feel passed over by the rise of the tribe of Levi and the selection of Aharon and his sons as priests was the ultimate insider – he merited bearing the holiest item in the universe. And this was actually a cushy job: Far from having to lug a massive amount of solid stone and gold, those who bore the Ark were actually borne aloft by it: Ha'aron noseh et nos'av.

What is it that by all logic should be so heavy as to be immovable, yet bears itself aloft along with a ton of fleshy human be-ing clinging to its golden staves? What's inside the ark must be a unique substance the like of which is to be found nowhere else? If only one could open the ark and see!! But Moshe has packed away the tablets, given by a kiss of the divine mouth [("Yishakeni min'shikot pihu" (let Him kiss me with the kisses of His mouth) – one of the opening verses of Shir Hashirim understood as the giving of the Torah; "Peh el peh adaber bo" (I shall speak to him mouth to mouth) – Hashem's clarification of what prophecy is to Miriam and Aharon at the end of B'ha'alotecha)]. So there would be no glancing inside, not with those Kohanim diligently covering over everything with beautiful, opaque ornamental coverings. Korach would never get to see the Ark, let alone what it was that spoke thrillingly to him through his very bones as its antigravity gently massaged away the desert, the miles, the aching limbs.

Korach, so close yet so far, desperately sought the access that had been granted to Aharon – to enter inside the inside, to offer, to kiss with his own kisses. His anarchistic rhetoric is a cover for one who cannot bear NOT to be ever lifted above the masses by and to the Only One. The Akedat Yitzchak (R. Yitzchak Arama), considers Korach's populist remarks as stated in a sarcastic tone. It was Moshe who had asserted the spiritual equality of the people – he, Korach, knew better, but he also knew that there was nothing like the populist, egalitarian, anarchistic claim to break up the monopoly of one elite and replace it with another. The people are always the pawns.

In an odd way, Korach got what he was seeking – he was devoured by fiery kisses as he held his firepan, and he was swallowed by the kiss of an earth opening its mouth to consume one so eager to draw close that he pushes aside those whose equality he championed.

All was not lost for Korach – his sons sired descendants who penned psalms and sang them in the Beit Hamikdash, and his firepans are pronounced as holy, and hammered into bronze cladding for the altar. But he was wrong about Aharon – he enters the Holy of Holies once a year and sees nothing, his vision obscured by a cloud of incense designed to do just that. For the key to the ark lies in not seeking to open it. And the truest leader, the one who rises to the top of his own accord, is one who - like Aharon - sees the potential holiness in all, and dedicates his all to its actualization.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The One (People) Who Must Not Be Named

Just as Balak brings Bil’am to consider his enemy from various vantage point, likewise does Parashat Balak allow us to view ourselves from the vantage point of others. The main story in Balak is of a single piece, and Am Yisrael appear only as foils for the central story – the interaction of Bil’am with Hashem. What is curious is that not only does Am Yisrael not appear as a real character in the story, we don’t even get a mention. Every time Balak or Bil’am refer to Am Yisrael in the non-visionary passages, they employ indirection: “this people”, “my enemies”, but never Yisrael. It almost feels that they are avoiding speaking the name, one which Bil’am, at least, employs so beautifully in his prophetic speeches. Now, recalling that this story of the interaction of other nations with Am Yisrael is being told in the Torah, I think the message is this: Yisrael is our name in the context of our covenantal interactions with Hashem, just as Hashem’s real name is used only in the conte...

My G-d, a Navaho?

--> Shabbat Shirah, it’s time to sing. Standing on the edge of a Red Sea that has returned to its roiling nature, drowning the fleeing, terrified Egyptian charioteers, Am Yisrael is ecstatic and, with Moshe, breaks into song. They sang in unison a song that welled up from a prophetic vision of redemption that, our sages tell us, outstripped even the visions of Yechezk’el and Isaiah, both of whom “saw” Hashem enthroned on high. The song so permeated the very fabric of being that it is introduced with the imperfect mood of the verb – Az Yashir Moshe… “Then Moshe will sing”, as though the song is every ringing in the background of our Jewishness. So what did they sing? Pure poetry, and therefore, as difficult to feel confident in parsing as it must be even to attempt to imagine what they were feeling at that moment. And yet, we reprise it every day in our morning prayers, as part of Pesukei D’Zimra. Every verse of this song is fit for deep reflection; I’ve chosen...

The Mishkan as an Instance of Tzaddik

I was speaking last night with Yonatan Neril, a student at the yeshiva with a keen interest in exploring the nexus between Torah and environmental consciousness. We were discussing a seminar he will be giving, G-d willing, in the Bat Area in the next few months. He wanted to present Ya'akov Avinu as a model of environmental consciousness, focusing on two episodes of his life as depicted by the Midrash. The first is the famous image of Ya'acov at the Yabok, preparing for the encounter with Esav and, having crossed his family safely over the river, goes back for pachim ketanim , little flasks, seeming worthless given the danger hovering over Ya'acov, yet, as we are told, the righteous prize their few possessions, since they attest to the fact that they have studiously avoided theft. Variants of that Midrash tell us that the contents of those small vials was olive oil from the branch presented by the dove to Noach and preserved during all the intervening generations. The o...