Skip to main content

A Leper a Mother Could Love

What is one to do with all this skin disease? Parashat Tazria, the locus classicus for tzara’at (usually, but very probably inaccurately, translated as “leprosy”), a disease that could cover the entire body with repulsive, oozing, hairy and perhaps disfiguring growths, pustules, welts etc. And not content to invoke misery upon the body of the sufferer, tzara’at could strike clothing and house, systematically rendering impure in the extreme every “container” within which a life might take refuge.

So it is more than a bit bizarre that the parashah opens with the laws of impurity of a birthing mother. “When a woman becomes fertile and bears a male…” Is there anything sweeter, more pure, than a newborn baby? The midrash in Vayikra Rabbah expresses amazement at the phenomenon: The mother is an av hatum’ah, capable of rendering impure other humans and vessels, yet the baby whose emergence invokes this impurity, is as pure as, well, the day he is born.

That image, however, belongs to an era before us crunchy-granola types took to shaping public images. The all-natural crowd insisted on displaying in birthing manuals and elsewhere the picture of a gooey scrunchball, bawling his lanuga-covered his head off. What’s so pure about that, we may ask?

So does Midrash Tanchuma. In interpreting a set of verses from Iyov as referring to the longings of Iyov for the time before troubles beset him, the Midrash has us looking, well before the invention of ultrasound, intrauterally at the developing fetus. “Like I was in the days of my horef”, says the verse. Winter, the period when seeds, watered by the percolating rains, prepare to sprout forth in spring. The rains splatter dirt, find the tiniest cracks in a sun-wearied roof, knead the soil into a muddy mess, aggravating everyone except the farmer. Slogging through his fields, drenched from head to toe, he thinks it’s the most marvelous thing!! For he knows that all that mud brings forth the earth’s bounty.

Likewise our little crying, seconds-old humanoid. “No one but a mother could love such a creature!” Precisely. “Because she sees what’s underneath all that goo!!” No! She sees the stuff of herself still covering that living part of her innermost depths and suddenly, the entire package is shining beauty, love and reconnection.

So it is, teaches the Midrash, with us sinners. Even though one may be filthy with transgressions, even when troubles and suffering heap their indignities upon one, when one wishes he was anywhere but in that situation, Hashem looks upon us, squawking in the puny enormity of our insuperable difficulties, irresistible urges no matter how foolish, trying to free ourselves and become re-entangled even as we break free, and Hashem sees all that seriousness, all that effort, all that straining to reach beyond, and Hashem is enraptured once again with His child/image/junior partner, and forgiveness and reconnection can be had.

Let every leper, no matter how intractable he perceives his case to be, recall, as the Torah recalls for him, that our original state is purity, connection, love, and our misdeeds and misconceptions are merely the gluey goo that brings a hand that soothes even as it scrubs behind the ears. For no tum’ah - no mass of mud and blood, acquired as we stumble up the road to the One, is too much for Momma Shechina to wipe away.

Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Frontlet Lobotomy

The tefillin worn on the head (henceforth, “ shel rosh ”) differ in a number of respects from the tefillin worn on the arm (henceforth, “ shel yad ”). One of the differences is this: Though both must contain the four passages in the Torah which make mention of the mitzvah of tefillin, the shel yad has all four passages written on a single parchment, in the order they appear in the Torah, rolled up and placed in the single compartment of the shel yad . The shel rosh , however, is constructed such that it has four small compartments side by side. Though these compartments appear to be tightly bound to one another, in fact, they are almost actually completely separate from one another. They only join at a common base, like the fingers of one’s hand. Into each compartment is placed one of the four passages, written on four separate parchments. Here is a list of the passages, in the order they appear in the Torah: 1.        Kadesh Li – Shemot 13:1-10 ...
Post a Comment
Read more

You're Shofar Away

For this commandment which I am commanding you today is not too wondrous for you, nor too distant. It is not in the heavens, such that you should say, “who will go up to the heavens and take it for us and inform us of it that we may do it; Nor is it over the sea, that you should say, “who will cross for us to the other side of the sea and inform us of it that we may do it. For this thing is so very close to you, in your mouth and in your heart to do it. Devarim 30: 11-14. So, it’s that easy, says Moshe, over three thousand years before Nike: Just do it!! The only problem is: what is “it”? Not such an easy question. Many of us are most likely walking around, carrying out our daily tasks with a mixture of freshness and drudgery, but in background that question keeps asking itself, punctuated a bit differently: what is it? But although Rosh Hashanah is almost upon us, let’s not get too wistfully philosophical – at least not yet. Let’s ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Wiping the Disk and Saving the Animal

Why the animals, too? That’s the question I’ve always dreaded from my kids when it comes time for Parashat Noach – meilah , the sinful humans, but why the animals? What did they do? Why did everything need to be obliterated. At the end of Bereshit, Hashem “regrets” he created man, since his urge and thoughts are only evil all day. And therefore – all creation is exterminated?? What’s the connection? It’s true, we’re told that “all flesh had corrupted its way upon the earth”, and the Midrash explains that everything had relations with everything else. But if this is true, why is man singled out for special mention? Did we lead the charge, seducing the ant and the elephant alike? And besides, isn’t this approach the complete antithesis of what we read not so long ago in Maftir Yonah, where Hashem has pity on Nineveh, where there are oh so many ignorant people AND EVEN LOTS OF ANIMALS!! So if he didn’t punish there, why does he punish here. And now f...
Post a Comment
Read more