Skip to main content

Shabat Chol HaMoed Pesach 5767

On Pesach we read the first of the five megillot, Shir HaShirim, a work drenched in the nature and its abundance, its fecundity. On three occasions the narrator abjures the daughters of Jerusalem "by the gazelles or by the does of the field" - do not arouse or awaken love until it please. Like many verses in Shir HaShirim, this verse, with its symbolism, is subject to many explanatory attempts by the various commentators over the generations. What, precisely, are those gazelle and those does (a deer, a female deer) supposed to represent?

Well, I have the inside track on this one, since I have a doe myself. I'm speaking of my daughter, Ayelet, whose name means "doe". G-d willing, Ayelet will be bat-mitzvah in a couple of months. She's a wonderful and challenging neshamah, and one of her outstanding characteristics is a love for animals that knows no bounds. Naturally, she has special affection for her pets, but her concern extends to any animal of any size with the possible exception of lice and scorpions. Just the other day, she asked me if it were permitted to violate Shabbat to save a wounded animal that wandered into the house, and, when I answered (with plenty of gentle explanation) "no", she responded incredulously, "you mean you could just watch while the animal suffered"?

So imagine how it must have felt for her (and for me, the father) to walk in to her room and discover that one of her hamsters was clearly and inexorably dying. No, it wasn't Shabbat, but there's nothing you can do for a dying hamster except, if you're Ayelet, hold it ever so gently and cry and cry and cry....

The next day we went out and buried "Cloud" (that was the name of the hamster - "Anan" in Hebrew") next to Ayelet's nectarine tree. There had to be something said or read, otherwise it would have felt to Ayelet that we were throwing the poor thing out, so I chose Mizmor 104 from Tehillim. Look it over again, and you'll see how appropriate it indeed felt to Ayelet. I stressed to her that we were saying this mizmor to Hashem, and Hashem would know what to do with the spark of living energy that had departed with the hamster's death.

Later that day, after minchah, I picked up a volume of Rav Kook's notebooks and opened it at random and let my eyes fall where they will. They fell on paragraph 89, represented by the Hebrew letter " peh-tet". Vocalize those letters with a segol and think of the English word. Now, here's what Rav Kook says in that teaching:

"In that elemental soul of Noach there were revealed all the creatures of the world, the entirety of life. They came to him to the ark, drawn by his inner nature, as a branch is drawn to its source. His supernal inner thirst to walk alongside the divine matched his inclinations to extended human living culture over the whole world. The righteous man ('ish tzaddik") and the man of the earth ("ish ha'adamah") in perfect union. The joining of these two perfections of soul is indeed a wonderous thing, that in better times would have sparkled with much greater effulgence. But the earthy element ultimately weighed things down..."



Emboldened by my find, I looked at the preceding teaching, and here is what Rav Kook says in paragraph 88:

"The soul of man in its expansiveness incorporates within it all the particular souls of all living creatures. Every living soul is a spark of a huge, inclusive, torchlike light, the soul of man. It only appears on the surface that each species and each individual exists independantly. The penetrating eye, however, sees a gigantic bonfire of life, holding fast in all its divisions to universal man as a flame holds fast to its wick. Amidst all those divisions many different levels and intensities of the light and the warmth are revealed, and each ready-for-forming creature is predisposed for only a very small portion of that light which illuminates within the soul of universal man. Every creature yearns and strives to return to the supernal light in its fullness, to reunite with the soul of man...."

A day and a half latter, the other hamster, "Star", died too, mercifully it was without any suffering that Ayelet noticed. The tears poured again, a bit less this time as she must have on some level prepared herself for such a possibility. We decided that we would learn for her Bat Mitzvah the details on the mitzvah of tza'ar ba'alei chayim.

Tremendous torrents of yearning and love does that girl have coursing through her, right now the main beneficiaries are the animals. She is young, though, so I'll abjure her by the gazelles and by the does, do not arouse or waken that love until it please.

As for the rest of us, bemused by the story but oh so distant from that immediacy of connection, that intensity of feeling - - - -awaken, arouse already!! The time has come!!

Atah Takum terachem tzion ki et l'chenena, KI VA MOED!!

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The One (People) Who Must Not Be Named

Just as Balak brings Bil’am to consider his enemy from various vantage point, likewise does Parashat Balak allow us to view ourselves from the vantage point of others. The main story in Balak is of a single piece, and Am Yisrael appear only as foils for the central story – the interaction of Bil’am with Hashem. What is curious is that not only does Am Yisrael not appear as a real character in the story, we don’t even get a mention. Every time Balak or Bil’am refer to Am Yisrael in the non-visionary passages, they employ indirection: “this people”, “my enemies”, but never Yisrael. It almost feels that they are avoiding speaking the name, one which Bil’am, at least, employs so beautifully in his prophetic speeches. Now, recalling that this story of the interaction of other nations with Am Yisrael is being told in the Torah, I think the message is this: Yisrael is our name in the context of our covenantal interactions with Hashem, just as Hashem’s real name is used only in the conte...

My G-d, a Navaho?

--> Shabbat Shirah, it’s time to sing. Standing on the edge of a Red Sea that has returned to its roiling nature, drowning the fleeing, terrified Egyptian charioteers, Am Yisrael is ecstatic and, with Moshe, breaks into song. They sang in unison a song that welled up from a prophetic vision of redemption that, our sages tell us, outstripped even the visions of Yechezk’el and Isaiah, both of whom “saw” Hashem enthroned on high. The song so permeated the very fabric of being that it is introduced with the imperfect mood of the verb – Az Yashir Moshe… “Then Moshe will sing”, as though the song is every ringing in the background of our Jewishness. So what did they sing? Pure poetry, and therefore, as difficult to feel confident in parsing as it must be even to attempt to imagine what they were feeling at that moment. And yet, we reprise it every day in our morning prayers, as part of Pesukei D’Zimra. Every verse of this song is fit for deep reflection; I’ve chosen...

A Sure Bet

How to begin? This is a dilemma that many of us face repeatedly in various situations in our lives. But none of us have had to face it in quite the way that Hashem needed to confront the problem of beginning at the outset of the Torah. It’s not just that it had never been done before, but, rather, how do you begin when you have no beginning? Ein Sof , the One Without End, is also Ein Tachlit , The One Without Beginning. So the question becomes not only HOW to begin, but WHAT IS “beginning” for such a One? Kabbalah has already extensively dealt with the question of transition from the infinite to the finite, and the entire array and interaction of the sefirot and their various constellations are in part a response to this question. But in addition to the ontological question indicated above, there is an epistemological question of perhaps greater moment: How does Hashem begin the Torah such that people get off on the right foot? How does He avoid embedding the seeds ...