Skip to main content

Shemot 5768

It's been remarked (at least by me, maybe by others) that the name Shemot is an ever-so-fitting title for this Chumash. The entire book is held together by revisiting the theme of names. Hashem's Name presented and represented in various settings, changing as the situation calls for, is only the most prominent of the name-themes woven throughout the text. We'll note a few others in this week's parashah:


  • The names of Ya'acov and his sons are repeated at the opening of the chumash/parashah, though the same passage occurs with more detail only a few chapters back in Parshat Vayigash.
    The names of seemingly minor characters, the two midwives, Shif'rah and Pu'ah, (Rashi says they were Yidden; Ramban says they were Egyptian) are announced.
    The people in formation are named by Par'oh - AM B"NEI YISRAEL
    Moshe is named by Bat Par'oh when he is drawn from the Nile.
    Moshe names his son Gershom in a distant land.
    Moshe asks Hashem's name and Hashem tells him first one name and then another.

But what I find equally interesting are those who do NOT receive names in this parasha of names: none of the characters involved in Moshe's emergence from the house of Par'oh - the Ish Mitzri, the Ish Ivri, the Shnei Anashim NItzim - all are not named:


  • Moshe's father, mother and sister, although subsequently named in the Torah, are referred either by a generic term (Ish, Ishah) or by their relationship to Moshe.
    Moshe himself is NOT NAMED BY HIS MOTHER!!
    Moshe remains nameless to Re'u'el (who himself is called by name only subsequent to his appearance and incidentally, at that) - he is the Ish in the conversation between Re'u'el and his daughters.
    The name Hashem shares with Moshe at the burning bush is hardly a name: I-will-be-what-I-will-be! The very name suggests that there is no guarantee of stability in the relationship.


And that's the key: A name is a key, opening the door allowing manifestation of the unstable, shifting, changing, but it only opens one door. It gives assurance, identity, it anchors one, but at the same time, it also threatens to lock one into a routine of being that, as comforting as it might be, denies the constancy of change and growth. It can hide one's essence from oneself. To paraphrase the Midrash on Hashem's name: Zeh Shmi L'Elem – “this name of mine is for hiding”.Changing one's name helps only very temporarily. Rather, the solution to the quandary is to relate to one's name as Hashem does - not to associate all of one's being with how one happens to be called. Rather, one should see one's name as the conduit through which the plenty emerging from one's being is funneled into the world. That plenty, called Tov in Hebrew, is what confers honor and substance on the name, and it is for this reason that the Sages said, "A name of goodness ascends above all".

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The One (People) Who Must Not Be Named

Just as Balak brings Bil’am to consider his enemy from various vantage point, likewise does Parashat Balak allow us to view ourselves from the vantage point of others. The main story in Balak is of a single piece, and Am Yisrael appear only as foils for the central story – the interaction of Bil’am with Hashem. What is curious is that not only does Am Yisrael not appear as a real character in the story, we don’t even get a mention. Every time Balak or Bil’am refer to Am Yisrael in the non-visionary passages, they employ indirection: “this people”, “my enemies”, but never Yisrael. It almost feels that they are avoiding speaking the name, one which Bil’am, at least, employs so beautifully in his prophetic speeches. Now, recalling that this story of the interaction of other nations with Am Yisrael is being told in the Torah, I think the message is this: Yisrael is our name in the context of our covenantal interactions with Hashem, just as Hashem’s real name is used only in the conte...

My G-d, a Navaho?

--> Shabbat Shirah, it’s time to sing. Standing on the edge of a Red Sea that has returned to its roiling nature, drowning the fleeing, terrified Egyptian charioteers, Am Yisrael is ecstatic and, with Moshe, breaks into song. They sang in unison a song that welled up from a prophetic vision of redemption that, our sages tell us, outstripped even the visions of Yechezk’el and Isaiah, both of whom “saw” Hashem enthroned on high. The song so permeated the very fabric of being that it is introduced with the imperfect mood of the verb – Az Yashir Moshe… “Then Moshe will sing”, as though the song is every ringing in the background of our Jewishness. So what did they sing? Pure poetry, and therefore, as difficult to feel confident in parsing as it must be even to attempt to imagine what they were feeling at that moment. And yet, we reprise it every day in our morning prayers, as part of Pesukei D’Zimra. Every verse of this song is fit for deep reflection; I’ve chosen...

The Mishkan as an Instance of Tzaddik

I was speaking last night with Yonatan Neril, a student at the yeshiva with a keen interest in exploring the nexus between Torah and environmental consciousness. We were discussing a seminar he will be giving, G-d willing, in the Bat Area in the next few months. He wanted to present Ya'akov Avinu as a model of environmental consciousness, focusing on two episodes of his life as depicted by the Midrash. The first is the famous image of Ya'acov at the Yabok, preparing for the encounter with Esav and, having crossed his family safely over the river, goes back for pachim ketanim , little flasks, seeming worthless given the danger hovering over Ya'acov, yet, as we are told, the righteous prize their few possessions, since they attest to the fact that they have studiously avoided theft. Variants of that Midrash tell us that the contents of those small vials was olive oil from the branch presented by the dove to Noach and preserved during all the intervening generations. The o...