Skip to main content

Shemot 5768

It's been remarked (at least by me, maybe by others) that the name Shemot is an ever-so-fitting title for this Chumash. The entire book is held together by revisiting the theme of names. Hashem's Name presented and represented in various settings, changing as the situation calls for, is only the most prominent of the name-themes woven throughout the text. We'll note a few others in this week's parashah:


  • The names of Ya'acov and his sons are repeated at the opening of the chumash/parashah, though the same passage occurs with more detail only a few chapters back in Parshat Vayigash.
    The names of seemingly minor characters, the two midwives, Shif'rah and Pu'ah, (Rashi says they were Yidden; Ramban says they were Egyptian) are announced.
    The people in formation are named by Par'oh - AM B"NEI YISRAEL
    Moshe is named by Bat Par'oh when he is drawn from the Nile.
    Moshe names his son Gershom in a distant land.
    Moshe asks Hashem's name and Hashem tells him first one name and then another.

But what I find equally interesting are those who do NOT receive names in this parasha of names: none of the characters involved in Moshe's emergence from the house of Par'oh - the Ish Mitzri, the Ish Ivri, the Shnei Anashim NItzim - all are not named:


  • Moshe's father, mother and sister, although subsequently named in the Torah, are referred either by a generic term (Ish, Ishah) or by their relationship to Moshe.
    Moshe himself is NOT NAMED BY HIS MOTHER!!
    Moshe remains nameless to Re'u'el (who himself is called by name only subsequent to his appearance and incidentally, at that) - he is the Ish in the conversation between Re'u'el and his daughters.
    The name Hashem shares with Moshe at the burning bush is hardly a name: I-will-be-what-I-will-be! The very name suggests that there is no guarantee of stability in the relationship.


And that's the key: A name is a key, opening the door allowing manifestation of the unstable, shifting, changing, but it only opens one door. It gives assurance, identity, it anchors one, but at the same time, it also threatens to lock one into a routine of being that, as comforting as it might be, denies the constancy of change and growth. It can hide one's essence from oneself. To paraphrase the Midrash on Hashem's name: Zeh Shmi L'Elem – “this name of mine is for hiding”.Changing one's name helps only very temporarily. Rather, the solution to the quandary is to relate to one's name as Hashem does - not to associate all of one's being with how one happens to be called. Rather, one should see one's name as the conduit through which the plenty emerging from one's being is funneled into the world. That plenty, called Tov in Hebrew, is what confers honor and substance on the name, and it is for this reason that the Sages said, "A name of goodness ascends above all".

Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Frontlet Lobotomy

The tefillin worn on the head (henceforth, “ shel rosh ”) differ in a number of respects from the tefillin worn on the arm (henceforth, “ shel yad ”). One of the differences is this: Though both must contain the four passages in the Torah which make mention of the mitzvah of tefillin, the shel yad has all four passages written on a single parchment, in the order they appear in the Torah, rolled up and placed in the single compartment of the shel yad . The shel rosh , however, is constructed such that it has four small compartments side by side. Though these compartments appear to be tightly bound to one another, in fact, they are almost actually completely separate from one another. They only join at a common base, like the fingers of one’s hand. Into each compartment is placed one of the four passages, written on four separate parchments. Here is a list of the passages, in the order they appear in the Torah: 1.        Kadesh Li – Shemot 13:1-10 2.        V’hayah ki Y’vi’a
Post a Comment
Read more

Tense and Swelling Faces

" Mah Tovu Ohaleicha Ya'akov, Mishkenoteicha Yisrael" .  How good are your tents, Ya'akov; your dwellings, Yisrael!  These words, some of the first we utter each morning as we enter the Beit Knesset for Shacharit, are the opening words of the third and climactic blessing that Bil'am utters in place of the curse he was summoned from afar to place upon Israel. Though Bil'am was intent on cursing Yisrael one way or another, and sought some subterfuge through which to slip in a curse, Hashem placed His word in Bil'am's mouth like a bit in the mouth of a donkey, and compelled him to follow His original, unchanged instructions of blessing Israel. See Ramban, who explains that Hashem's consent to Bil'am's journey was predicated upon the latter's understanding that he may well end up blessing Israel in Balak's presence! So Bil'am knew he was going to be compelled to bless, and yet he went anyway, and uttered some of the most lo
Post a Comment
Read more

Here I Am Not

The brief exchange between Avraham and Yitzchak on the way to the Akeidah , less than two verses long, and sandwiched between the two phrases “and the two of them walked together” , is the only conversation between this primal father-and-son pair recorded in the Torah. It is all the more powerful because of its brevity, because of its singleness, and because of what it doesn’t say explicitly yet, by omission, makes overwhelmingly present. When they set off for Har HaMoriah , Avraham takes only what the moment requires – he leaves behind his servants, the donkey and, presumably, any of the provisions they brought on their three-day journey, he takes the wood for the offering (placing it upon Yitzchak), the fire and the knife. That’s all there is – two men, wood, fire and knife. Thus, the set off together. Here is the conversation. Yitzchak says to Avraham, his father, he says, “my father”, and Avraham says, “Here I am son”, and he (Yitzchak) says, “here are the fire and the wood
Post a Comment
Read more