Skip to main content

Miketz 5768

So Par'oh dreams, seven fat cows devoured by seven scrawny ones, and he suddenly wakes up; he sleeps again, dreams, seven substantial stalks of grain devoured by seven withered ones, he wakes up - it's a dream. Evidently, he fell asleep again, for the Torah goes on to say, "And when morning came, vatipa'em rucho, he sent for and called his wizards and wisemen and told them the dream, but none could interpret it to Par'oh's satisfaction. Then the cupbearer remembers Yosef. He tells of what happened in jail, how Yosef correctly interpreted the dreams, Par'oh sends for him, he is washed and made presentable, comes before Par'oh, gives Hashem the credit for the correct interpretation of the cupbearer's dream, and precedes to hear and interpret Par'oh's dreams to Par'oh's satisfaction. What is vatipa'em rucho? Rashi quotes Onkelos, "his spirit was shaken" and goes on: "it was ringing inside him like a bell". The image is of the spirit clattering around inside one like the clapper of a bell, creating sound/noise each time it smashes into the walls of one's mind/consciousness. Rashi also reminds us that when Nebuchadnezzar had a dream and awoke agitated, it is stated, vatitpa'em rucho - his spirit shook itself. Rashi tells us this is because, while Par'oh had only forgotten the meaning of the dream, Nebuchadnezzar had forgotten both the dream itself AND its interpretation. Dreams come with their interpretations, or at least the keys to their interpretation. This is the understanding of our tradition. Regarding the dreams of the cupbearer and the baker, the Midrash tells us that each man dreamed his dream, and the interpretation of his fellow's dream. It was Yosef who was able to apply the interpretation to the correct dream. Dreams are revelations in potential - the Talmud tells us that dreams are 1/60 of prophecy. A dream which goes uninterpreted is like a letter which goes unopened and unread. So - we must interpret dreams. Further, the Talmud tells us, the dream follows its interpretation. So does that mean that however one interprets a dream, that's what will happen? No - recall that there were plenty of wise men willing to interpret Par'oh's dream - it was just that none of the interpretations they offered meshed with his inexpressible sense of what would constitute a real interpretation and not some mask imposed from without. When he heard Yosef's interpretation, he knew that that was the true one., and he said, "Is there such as this one to be found - a man whom the spirit of G-d is within him!". Only then did Par'oh's spirit find ease.

The clanging and banging of our souls starts up most every night when Hashem opens for us the palace of dreams. The chaos of the imagery we take from there is a cacophony of possibilities that rail against logic and pull at the fabric of our senses. In the morning, if we're lucky, our souls are at unease; someone is trying to tell us something but we just can't figure it out. It's good to remember that, often, the very telling of the dream, the refusal to dismiss its impossible images as so much stuff and let's get on with things, is the beginning of "ringing the changes." It converts that cacophony of inner sounds into a symphony of possibilities and directions being revealed to us by Hashem in the only way He can get things passed the chopper blades of waking, rational consciousness. Dream on!

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The One (People) Who Must Not Be Named

Just as Balak brings Bil’am to consider his enemy from various vantage point, likewise does Parashat Balak allow us to view ourselves from the vantage point of others. The main story in Balak is of a single piece, and Am Yisrael appear only as foils for the central story – the interaction of Bil’am with Hashem. What is curious is that not only does Am Yisrael not appear as a real character in the story, we don’t even get a mention. Every time Balak or Bil’am refer to Am Yisrael in the non-visionary passages, they employ indirection: “this people”, “my enemies”, but never Yisrael. It almost feels that they are avoiding speaking the name, one which Bil’am, at least, employs so beautifully in his prophetic speeches. Now, recalling that this story of the interaction of other nations with Am Yisrael is being told in the Torah, I think the message is this: Yisrael is our name in the context of our covenantal interactions with Hashem, just as Hashem’s real name is used only in the conte...

My G-d, a Navaho?

--> Shabbat Shirah, it’s time to sing. Standing on the edge of a Red Sea that has returned to its roiling nature, drowning the fleeing, terrified Egyptian charioteers, Am Yisrael is ecstatic and, with Moshe, breaks into song. They sang in unison a song that welled up from a prophetic vision of redemption that, our sages tell us, outstripped even the visions of Yechezk’el and Isaiah, both of whom “saw” Hashem enthroned on high. The song so permeated the very fabric of being that it is introduced with the imperfect mood of the verb – Az Yashir Moshe… “Then Moshe will sing”, as though the song is every ringing in the background of our Jewishness. So what did they sing? Pure poetry, and therefore, as difficult to feel confident in parsing as it must be even to attempt to imagine what they were feeling at that moment. And yet, we reprise it every day in our morning prayers, as part of Pesukei D’Zimra. Every verse of this song is fit for deep reflection; I’ve chosen...

A Sure Bet

How to begin? This is a dilemma that many of us face repeatedly in various situations in our lives. But none of us have had to face it in quite the way that Hashem needed to confront the problem of beginning at the outset of the Torah. It’s not just that it had never been done before, but, rather, how do you begin when you have no beginning? Ein Sof , the One Without End, is also Ein Tachlit , The One Without Beginning. So the question becomes not only HOW to begin, but WHAT IS “beginning” for such a One? Kabbalah has already extensively dealt with the question of transition from the infinite to the finite, and the entire array and interaction of the sefirot and their various constellations are in part a response to this question. But in addition to the ontological question indicated above, there is an epistemological question of perhaps greater moment: How does Hashem begin the Torah such that people get off on the right foot? How does He avoid embedding the seeds ...