Parashat Behar-Bechukotai (Revised May 8, 2026) This week's double parashah, Behar and Bechuotai, bring to a close the book of Vayikra, a book the all-consuming focus of which is, undoubtably, KEDUSHAH, holiness. The last chapter is concerned largely with the kind of vows people make in dedicating something to the service of Hashem in the Mikdash. There are many laws regulating this seemingly noble motivation and its accompanying action, but my attention was taken this time around by the following law: "If (the devoted thing) is an animal of the kind from which an offering is brought to Hashem, any one which is given to Hashem shall be kodesh . One shall not exchange it ( lo yachalifenu ) nor shall one substitute for it ( yamir oto ), good for bad or bad for good; now if one DOES substitute for it, it will be that it and its substitute will be kodesh ." Vayikra 27:10-11 This mitzvah turns out to be very curious, because one is lashed for its intentional violation...
The Human Black Hole Parashat Korach, 5767 I'm very taken with Korach. Oh, I know, if I start up with puns on "Vayikach Korach", we'll be here till carbon emissions decrease, but it still grabs me every time. The first two verses read, translated literally: "And Korach took (son of Yitzhar son of Kehat son of Levi), and Datan and Aviram and On ben Pelet sons of Reuven. And they rose up before Moshe and men from the sons of Israel two hundred and fifty, princes of the assembly, those called to meeting, men of renown" The obvious and famous problem is - What did Korach take? There is no object to this transitive verb! Here's a digest of some of the most well-known solutions to the problem: Rashi : He took himself to the other side, so as to be separated from the assembly to contest the (assignment) of the priesthood (to Aharon). Ibn Ezra : "He took men", the object being omitted (he gives an example of a similar occurr...